<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: One Way Link Versus Reciprocal Link</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.djarot.com/one-way-link-versus-reciprocal-link/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.djarot.com/one-way-link-versus-reciprocal-link/</link>
	<description>Art of Simplicity</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 09:11:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>	<item>
		<title>By: djarot</title>
		<link>http://www.djarot.com/one-way-link-versus-reciprocal-link/comment-page-1/#comment-10799</link>
		<dc:creator>djarot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 10:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.djarot.com/?p=299#comment-10799</guid>
		<description>@hiwatarigie :Kalo akhirnya ada manfaatnya, aku cmn bisa ikut seneng mas. :) Itu yg pasti. Masalah mana yg cocok, mana yg ngga cocok, itu hak pribadi masing². Ngga ada yg bisa maksain sebuah opini. 

SEO emang masi tetep misteri, walopun banyak hal² praktikal yang memang udah terbukti bener, tapi tetep masi ada juga hal² praktikal laen yg musti di research-kan lebih lanjut. 

&lt;em&gt;Kenapa?&lt;/em&gt;
Karena ngga semua algoritma google di release ke publik. Yg ketahuan oleh para pelaku seo bisa dibilang blom separuhnya. Sikap google sendiri juga cenderung abstain dgn opini publik. 

Walopun kalau ada hal² baru yg kemungkinan emang amat sangat perlu di-publikasikan, selalu mereka publish melewati Matt Cutts. Contohnya masalah rel canonical.

Ijin &quot;Copy-Paste-Review&quot; nya tak granted. Boleh. Attribusi yang disertakan lebih bagus. Artinya, mas ngga bakalan tak tuntut karena ngambil conten dari sini.


&lt;b&gt;Duplicate Content?&lt;/b&gt;
Walopun gitu, mas perlu perhatiin jg masalah duplikat konten yg tak singgung di postingku ttg &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.djarot.com/10-quick-ways-to-get-google-kick-your-site-out/&quot; rel=&quot;bookmark&quot; title=&quot;10 Quick Ways to Get Google Kick Your Site Out!&quot;&gt;10 Quick Ways to Get Google Kick Your Site Out!&lt;/a&gt;.

Perijinan emang bikin mas lepas dari masalah copyrighting, tapi sama sekali bukan jalan keluar buat masalah Duplikat content.

Thanks berat juga udah sering nongkrong di sini. Seneng juga rasane, ada yg dapet manfaat dari apa yg tak tulis. Sukses.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@hiwatarigie :Kalo akhirnya ada manfaatnya, aku cmn bisa ikut seneng mas. <img src='http://www.djarot.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Itu yg pasti. Masalah mana yg cocok, mana yg ngga cocok, itu hak pribadi masing². Ngga ada yg bisa maksain sebuah opini. </p>
<p>SEO emang masi tetep misteri, walopun banyak hal² praktikal yang memang udah terbukti bener, tapi tetep masi ada juga hal² praktikal laen yg musti di research-kan lebih lanjut. </p>
<p><em>Kenapa?</em><br />
Karena ngga semua algoritma google di release ke publik. Yg ketahuan oleh para pelaku seo bisa dibilang blom separuhnya. Sikap google sendiri juga cenderung abstain dgn opini publik. </p>
<p>Walopun kalau ada hal² baru yg kemungkinan emang amat sangat perlu di-publikasikan, selalu mereka publish melewati Matt Cutts. Contohnya masalah rel canonical.</p>
<p>Ijin &#8220;Copy-Paste-Review&#8221; nya tak granted. Boleh. Attribusi yang disertakan lebih bagus. Artinya, mas ngga bakalan tak tuntut karena ngambil conten dari sini.</p>
<p><b>Duplicate Content?</b><br />
Walopun gitu, mas perlu perhatiin jg masalah duplikat konten yg tak singgung di postingku ttg <a href="http://www.djarot.com/10-quick-ways-to-get-google-kick-your-site-out/" rel="bookmark" title="10 Quick Ways to Get Google Kick Your Site Out!">10 Quick Ways to Get Google Kick Your Site Out!</a>.</p>
<p>Perijinan emang bikin mas lepas dari masalah copyrighting, tapi sama sekali bukan jalan keluar buat masalah Duplikat content.</p>
<p>Thanks berat juga udah sering nongkrong di sini. Seneng juga rasane, ada yg dapet manfaat dari apa yg tak tulis. Sukses.  <img src='http://www.djarot.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hiwatarigie</title>
		<link>http://www.djarot.com/one-way-link-versus-reciprocal-link/comment-page-1/#comment-10785</link>
		<dc:creator>hiwatarigie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 05:42:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.djarot.com/?p=299#comment-10785</guid>
		<description>setelah sedikit berpikir keras dan optimalisasi dengan tulisan2 mas sebagai referensinya.. alhamdullilah blogku jd PR 2... :) makasih mas atas tulisannya... sip bgt!

tapi sejujurnya aku sempet bingung, teutama masalah bad neighborhoods dan link exchange yang lazim dilakukan saat ini dan lain2 yang tercakup pada beberapa klaim mas yang ini :

Here ‘re the Link Schemes you should all avoid :
   1. Links intended to manipulate PageRank
   2. Links to web spammers or bad neighborhoods on the web
   3. Excessive reciprocal links or excessive link exchanging (”Link to me and I’ll link to you.”)
   4. Buying or selling links that pass PageRank

oh ya, masalah niche juga... masalah quantiity dan quality link jg... 

saya tdk bisa bilang apa2,dunia SEO memang penuh misteri, dan akhirnya beberapa klaim mas ada yang belum saya percayai sepenuhnya... :) hehe3... tapi sejujurnya tulisan mas sangat ilmiah, logis dan bermanfaat (bermanfaat bgt, PRku naek)...

untuk itu mohon ijin sedikit &#039;copy-paste-review&#039; tulisan mas... :)
tentunya dengan menuliskan sang author-nya... hehe3...

sekali lagi makasih atas info SEOnya... :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>setelah sedikit berpikir keras dan optimalisasi dengan tulisan2 mas sebagai referensinya.. alhamdullilah blogku jd PR 2&#8230; <img src='http://www.djarot.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  makasih mas atas tulisannya&#8230; sip bgt!</p>
<p>tapi sejujurnya aku sempet bingung, teutama masalah bad neighborhoods dan link exchange yang lazim dilakukan saat ini dan lain2 yang tercakup pada beberapa klaim mas yang ini :</p>
<p>Here ‘re the Link Schemes you should all avoid :<br />
   1. Links intended to manipulate PageRank<br />
   2. Links to web spammers or bad neighborhoods on the web<br />
   3. Excessive reciprocal links or excessive link exchanging (”Link to me and I’ll link to you.”)<br />
   4. Buying or selling links that pass PageRank</p>
<p>oh ya, masalah niche juga&#8230; masalah quantiity dan quality link jg&#8230; </p>
<p>saya tdk bisa bilang apa2,dunia SEO memang penuh misteri, dan akhirnya beberapa klaim mas ada yang belum saya percayai sepenuhnya&#8230; <img src='http://www.djarot.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  hehe3&#8230; tapi sejujurnya tulisan mas sangat ilmiah, logis dan bermanfaat (bermanfaat bgt, PRku naek)&#8230;</p>
<p>untuk itu mohon ijin sedikit &#8216;copy-paste-review&#8217; tulisan mas&#8230; <img src='http://www.djarot.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
tentunya dengan menuliskan sang author-nya&#8230; hehe3&#8230;</p>
<p>sekali lagi makasih atas info SEOnya&#8230; <img src='http://www.djarot.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: djarot</title>
		<link>http://www.djarot.com/one-way-link-versus-reciprocal-link/comment-page-1/#comment-9958</link>
		<dc:creator>djarot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 23:34:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.djarot.com/?p=299#comment-9958</guid>
		<description>Is it nofollowed? If so, then google will ignore it. If it &#039;s dofollow, it would still be counted. One other most important thing as our personal consideration is a same niche. Is it the same niche with ours? If no, the strength distributed to our site pretty much too tiny to affect our site &#039;s rank. Mathematically speaking - hardly counted as &quot;1&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it nofollowed? If so, then google will ignore it. If it &#8216;s dofollow, it would still be counted. One other most important thing as our personal consideration is a same niche. Is it the same niche with ours? If no, the strength distributed to our site pretty much too tiny to affect our site &#8216;s rank. Mathematically speaking &#8211; hardly counted as &#8220;1&#8243;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Backlink</title>
		<link>http://www.djarot.com/one-way-link-versus-reciprocal-link/comment-page-1/#comment-9820</link>
		<dc:creator>Backlink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 04:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.djarot.com/?p=299#comment-9820</guid>
		<description>Questioning about backlink from .edu. some people say it doesn&#039;t effect google anymore... is it correct? Thanks in advance!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Questioning about backlink from .edu. some people say it doesn&#8217;t effect google anymore&#8230; is it correct? Thanks in advance!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pengobatan tradisional diabetes</title>
		<link>http://www.djarot.com/one-way-link-versus-reciprocal-link/comment-page-1/#comment-9185</link>
		<dc:creator>pengobatan tradisional diabetes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 17:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.djarot.com/?p=299#comment-9185</guid>
		<description>yoi bro.. reciprocal tends to be lose and lose..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yoi bro.. reciprocal tends to be lose and lose..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dany Event Planning</title>
		<link>http://www.djarot.com/one-way-link-versus-reciprocal-link/comment-page-1/#comment-8358</link>
		<dc:creator>Dany Event Planning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 13:22:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.djarot.com/?p=299#comment-8358</guid>
		<description>Call me uneducated or old-fashioned but I was trying to register my website on a site and they told me to provide a &quot;Reciprocal Link URL&quot;. What exactly is that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Call me uneducated or old-fashioned but I was trying to register my website on a site and they told me to provide a &#8220;Reciprocal Link URL&#8221;. What exactly is that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neil</title>
		<link>http://www.djarot.com/one-way-link-versus-reciprocal-link/comment-page-1/#comment-8313</link>
		<dc:creator>neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 19:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.djarot.com/?p=299#comment-8313</guid>
		<description>one way links are much more valuable than recipricol links, and its true that exchanges can be harmful. thats why a gateway such as onewayseo .com should be used</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>one way links are much more valuable than recipricol links, and its true that exchanges can be harmful. thats why a gateway such as onewayseo .com should be used</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: djarot</title>
		<link>http://www.djarot.com/one-way-link-versus-reciprocal-link/comment-page-1/#comment-7863</link>
		<dc:creator>djarot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 17:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.djarot.com/?p=299#comment-7863</guid>
		<description>Natural way always does it. It always is.
Putting more efforts, uh huh definitely.
:D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Natural way always does it. It always is.<br />
Putting more efforts, uh huh definitely. <img src='http://www.djarot.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rose &#124; MN Law Advice</title>
		<link>http://www.djarot.com/one-way-link-versus-reciprocal-link/comment-page-1/#comment-7861</link>
		<dc:creator>Rose &#124; MN Law Advice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 15:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.djarot.com/?p=299#comment-7861</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I believe in doing things the natural way. I&#039;m scared of angering search engines so I just put more effort on posting comments on blogs. Good thing, I love reading :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I believe in doing things the natural way. I&#8217;m scared of angering search engines so I just put more effort on posting comments on blogs. Good thing, I love reading <img src='http://www.djarot.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: almir</title>
		<link>http://www.djarot.com/one-way-link-versus-reciprocal-link/comment-page-1/#comment-7801</link>
		<dc:creator>almir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 17:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.djarot.com/?p=299#comment-7801</guid>
		<description>yeah one way backlinks are the best quality when it comes to building backlinks as opposed to a reciprocal link</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah one way backlinks are the best quality when it comes to building backlinks as opposed to a reciprocal link</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

